When a central bank starts moving gold out of U.S. custody and openly uses words like “crisis,” investors should pay attention.

That is exactly what just happened.

De Nederlandsche Bank, the central bank of the Netherlands, announced that it had repositioned approximately 86 tonnes of gold previously held in New York and Ottawa, shifting a larger share of its reserves to London. Its stated reasons included increasing geopolitical unrest, better crisis preparedness, and the ability to access and trade the metal more quickly during severe market stress. (dnb.nl)

This wasn’t a rumor. It wasn’t an anonymous leak.

It came directly from the central bank.

And for technical trader Gareth Soloway, who joined Daniela Cambone, the message fits into a much larger trend: governments are beginning to think differently about where gold is held, what role physical bullion could play in a monetary crisis, and what happens if confidence in fiat currencies continues to erode.

His longer-term technical target?

Gold near $13,000 an ounce by 2030.

That is a forecast—not a guarantee. But the forces pushing central banks toward gold are increasingly difficult to dismiss.

Why Is the Netherlands Moving Gold Out of U.S. Custody?

The Dutch central bank isn’t dumping gold.

Quite the opposite.

Its total reserves remain 612.4 tonnes, valued at €72.2 billion at the end of 2025. What changed is where that gold sits and how quickly it can potentially be mobilized. (dnb.nl)

Before the relocation:

• 31.3% of Dutch gold was held in New York
• 19.7% was held in Ottawa
• 18.1% was held in London
• 30.8% was held in the Netherlands

Afterward:

• New York fell to 18.5%
• Ottawa fell to 18.5%
• London jumped to 32.1%
• The Netherlands remained at 30.8%

Most notably, DNB said London-held gold is easier to trade in a crisis and described gold itself as an asset suited to hedging “extreme systemic risks.” (dnb.nl)

That deserves more attention than the usual daily market noise.

Central banks don’t prepare reserve assets for severe crises because they expect everything to function perfectly.

DNB also clarified that this wasn’t simply 86 tonnes being loaded onto aircraft and flown from America to Britain. Roughly 59 tonnes held in New York were sold and replaced with London-standard gold, while more than 27 tonnes were physically transferred through a coordinated relocation process. Total Dutch holdings were unchanged. (dnb.nl)

So the story isn’t “the Netherlands abandoned America.”

The more important story is this:

A major Western central bank decided that the geographic location and immediate tradability of its physical gold matter more in today’s geopolitical environment than they did before.

Central Banks Are Treating Gold Like Strategic Insurance

The Netherlands isn’t operating in a vacuum.

Central-bank demand for gold has remained historically elevated.

According to the World Gold Council, central banks purchased a net 863 tonnes in 2025, following three consecutive years in which buying exceeded 1,000 tonnes. The 2025 figure was still dramatically above the 2010–2021 annual average of 473 tonnes. (World Gold Council)

And the appetite hasn’t disappeared in 2026.

The World Gold Council’s 2026 survey found:

• 89% of surveyed reserve managers expect global central-bank gold holdings to increase over the next 12 months
• A record 45% expect their own institution to increase its gold holdings
• 83% expect gold to represent a larger share of reserves five years from now
• 74% expect the U.S. dollar’s share of global reserves to decline over the next five years (World Gold Council)

Meanwhile, reported first-half 2026 buying included 82 tonnes from Poland, 40 tonnes from China, 41 tonnes from Uzbekistan, and 27 tonnes from Kazakhstan. (World Gold Council)

This doesn’t mean the dollar disappears tomorrow.

It does mean reserve managers are doing something very different from simply trusting the status quo.

They are diversifying.

And increasingly, that diversification includes physical gold.

Soloway: The Fiat System Is Approaching a Much Bigger Test

In his conversation with Daniela, Gareth Soloway argued that the Dutch move is part of a longer-term transition.

His concern centers on something financial markets have been able to postpone—but never resolve:

Debt keeps growing faster than the political willingness to restrain it.

For decades, governments could borrow, stimulate the economy, and theoretically reduce debt burdens during expansionary periods.

Soloway’s criticism is that the second half of that equation largely disappeared.

Instead, deficits became structural.

Debt accumulated in good times and bad.

And now policymakers face rising interest costs while continually refinancing enormous quantities of government securities.

The U.S. Treasury estimated in August that it would need $739 billion in privately held net marketable borrowing during the July–September 2026 quarter, followed by another $628 billion in October–December. (U.S. Department of the Treasury)

Treasury’s own advisory committee has also warned that, based on median primary-dealer forecasts and current issuance structures, financing needs could create a roughly $1.45 trillion funding shortfall across FY2027–FY2028 absent adjustments to issuance. (U.S. Department of the Treasury)

That’s the backdrop to Soloway’s thesis.

The question isn’t simply whether Washington can issue more debt.

It can.

The more uncomfortable question is:

At what interest rate will the world continue absorbing it?

The 10-Year Treasury Is Flashing a Warning

This is where Soloway’s technical analysis becomes particularly important.

During the interview, he highlighted the 4.8% area on the 10-year Treasury yield as critical resistance. A sustained break, he argued, could open the door toward 5%.

That scenario is no longer theoretical.

On September 9, the 10-year Treasury yield climbed to roughly 4.84%, its highest level since 2023, as investors grappled with inflation risks, rising oil prices, and Treasury’s expanded long-term debt buyback plans. (Reuters)

Why does 5% matter?

Because higher Treasury yields don’t stay isolated inside the bond market.

They can filter into:

• Mortgage rates
• Corporate borrowing costs
• Government interest expense
• Commercial real estate financing
• Consumer credit
• Equity valuations
• Federal refinancing costs

And eventually, policymakers face an ugly choice.

Allow borrowing costs to rise enough to potentially weaken the economy—or intervene more aggressively and risk damaging confidence in the currency.

That is the monetary trap gold investors are watching.

Can the Fed Really Escape the Money-Printing Cycle?

The Federal Reserve’s next scheduled policy meeting is September 15–16, 2026. (Federal Reserve)

Soloway’s argument is that the Fed’s dual mandate creates a difficult long-term balancing act.

If inflation remains elevated, policymakers may need tighter monetary conditions.

But sufficiently restrictive policy can weaken economic growth and employment.

If unemployment then rises sharply, pressure builds for monetary easing.

That is the cycle investors have seen repeatedly:

Inflation → tightening → economic stress → easing → renewed liquidity.

Whether the next intervention takes the exact form of traditional quantitative easing is unknowable.

But Soloway’s broader point is harder to ignore: highly indebted systems become increasingly sensitive to interest rates.

And the more sensitive the system becomes, the harder it is for policymakers to maintain genuinely restrictive monetary conditions indefinitely.

Why Soloway Sees $13,000 Gold by 2030

For anyone expecting gold to immediately explode higher, Soloway offered a more nuanced technical outlook.

He expects near-term consolidation and potentially substantial sideways trading before another major leg upward.

Why?

Because sharp price declines create trapped buyers who may sell as gold returns to their original purchase price.

That overhead supply can slow momentum.

But Soloway believes that once those sellers are absorbed—and if sovereign demand, debt stress, currency concerns, and gold repatriation continue—the next major move could be much larger.

His technical forecast:

Gold could reach approximately $13,000 per ounce by 2030.

Again, $13,000 is Soloway’s price target, not an established outcome.

But consider what’s already happening.

Gold recorded 53 new all-time highs during 2025, while total global gold demand reached a record 5,002 tonnes. Investment demand climbed to 2,175 tonnes, and central banks added another 863 tonnes. (World Gold Council)

This rally isn’t being driven by one factor.

It’s being supported by a convergence of pressures:

• Persistent sovereign debt growth
• Geopolitical instability
• Central-bank diversification
• Currency concerns
• Elevated government borrowing requirements
• Demand for assets outside the traditional fiat system

Gold isn’t predicting one specific crisis. It is increasingly being accumulated as insurance against multiple potential crises.

Gold vs. Silver: Why Gold May Lead the Monetary Trade

Soloway also sees an important distinction between gold and silver.

Both are tangible assets.

Both have thousands of years of monetary history.

Both can benefit when investors lose confidence in paper currencies.

But their demand structures differ.

Gold remains primarily a monetary and reserve asset.

Silver has monetary characteristics too, but it is also heavily tied to industrial demand and therefore to the health of the global economy.

That distinction matters.

If economic growth weakens substantially, Soloway believes silver could remain more volatile and potentially lag gold in the near term—even while maintaining a bullish longer-term hard-asset thesis.

His view was that silver could still see downside pressure before establishing a stronger base.

For wealth preservation, that difference matters:

• Gold may respond more directly to monetary instability and sovereign reserve diversification
• Silver offers hard-asset characteristics but carries greater industrial sensitivity
• Holding both can provide exposure to different parts of the precious-metals market

Physical Gold and Silver: Why Tangible Assets Matter in a Crisis

The Dutch decision illustrates a principle private investors often overlook:

Ownership is one question. Location and accessibility are another.

DNB already owned the gold.

Yet it still concluded that some of its reserves needed to be repositioned because accessibility and tradability could become critical during a severe crisis.

That’s worth considering when evaluating physical gold and silver as part of a wealth-preservation strategy.

Unlike financial assets built on another institution’s promise to pay, physical precious metals are tangible assets.

They don’t depend on:

• Corporate earnings
• A government’s promise to repay a bond
• A bank’s solvency
• A digital payment network remaining accessible
• Another party fulfilling a contractual obligation

That doesn’t mean gold or silver rise every day.

They don’t.

It means their role is different.

For investors worried about the gold vs. dollar relationship, currency debasement, monetary intervention, geopolitical conflict, or systemic instability, precious metals have historically served as an inflation hedge and store of wealth precisely because they exist outside the credit system.

And today’s central banks appear to understand that distinction very well.

The World Gold Council’s 2026 survey specifically found that reserve managers increasingly see gold as a strategic asset for diversification and risk mitigation—and that some are reconsidering where their gold is vaulted. (World Gold Council)

The Warning Isn’t $13,000 Gold. It’s What Could Cause It.

It’s easy to focus on Gareth Soloway’s $13,000 gold target.

But that’s not the most important part of this story.

The bigger signal is what institutions themselves are doing.

The Dutch central bank isn’t predicting financial Armageddon.

It isn’t abandoning U.S. custody entirely.

But it is moving a meaningful portion of its gold reserves closer to the world’s deepest physical bullion market while openly strengthening its preparations for severe crises.

Central banks globally continue buying gold.

Treasury borrowing requirements remain massive.

Long-term interest rates are pressing against technically and economically important levels.

And policymakers are attempting to manage inflation, growth, government financing, and financial stability simultaneously.

None of this proves a currency crisis is imminent.

But it does suggest the world’s largest financial institutions are increasingly unwilling to assume today’s monetary system will remain frictionless forever.

For financially conservative investors, the takeaway isn’t to chase price.

It’s to think the way central banks are thinking:

Where is your wealth?

What is it dependent on?

And if the financial environment changes faster than expected, how much of that wealth is held in assets you can actually access and control?

About ITM Trading

ITM Trading has over 28 years of experience helping clients safeguard their wealth through personalized strategies built on physical gold and silver. Our team of experts delivers research-backed guidance tailored to today’s economic threats.

THINKING ABOUT PURCHASING GOLD & SILVER?

Get expert guidance from our team of analysts with 28+ years of experience.

👉 [SCHEDULE YOUR CALL HERE] or call 866-706-9061